I don't want to get of track so i'll keep my rant about how/why this happens brief.
But seriously think about that or a second. This article was published in 2014. So why are all the attention now? I don't have that answer, aside from assuming all of these sites are copying each other for clicks to their sites. I mean that's fine it's something that happens on probably all social websites.
Here are all the sites that were running this 2014 article:
Washington post - Christopher Ingraham - 26Aug2014 (Awesome time to report this article)
High Times - Samantha Cashin - 09Apr2018 (4 years later...)
Fatherly.com - Lauren Vinopal - 12Jul2018 (4 years later and now you can borrow from other sites)
So these are just a few that cite this study, and yet all of them simply re-state the findings in the study. Which is fine but again it's just a puff piece. It's click bait for getting people to your website so you can generate ad revenue.
--- deep breath ---
...rant over...
Back to the article
I certainly do not want to downplay the conclusions made from this study, looking at marijuana use and rates of intimate partner violence (IPV). It's pretty awesome that they were able to follow so many couples 634 to be exact and for 9 years!!! (here is the full article: link)
Here are the amazing findings they were able to conclude:
- about 1 in 5 married women and 1 in 3 married men admitted to using marijuana
- IPV rates were lower where at lease one spouse used marijuana
- Marijuana use hinted towards less frequent IPV, with the lowest IPV group being the couples who both used marijuana frequently
- Important to note: subjects were all heterosexual, newly married, and first time married couples
Aside from the results supporting fewer incidence of domestic violence in couples that use marijuana. There was a lot of unpleasant information in that article.
The study only looked at one type of IPV. That being physical aggression and injury (e.g. slapping, beating up, choking). But there are at least three categories of IPV: psychological, physical, and sexual aggression.
I felt that this study was limited in the design to only look at physical IPV. I would like to see where the others ranked in this type of longitudinal study.
I also was a little upset that none of the websites actually expanded on the findings and or limitations.
I bring this point up because there was an article from 2008 same journal (Psychol Addict Behav) out of Ohio U, showed that Marijuana use was associated with IPV by men arrested for domestic violence. In this article they were able to conclude that marijuana use was related to all three forms of IPV. 2008 Article - Marijuana related to all forms of IPV.
One last point about the positive article. There were some pretty discouraging figures in the paper.
- Nearly 40% of all husbands conducted IPV on their wives, with an average of 4.0 times per year. And keep in mind the survey was only asking for physical forms of domestic violence.
That is just way too high. Way too high.
Again not trying to undermine the interesting findings. I just think the study was limited to a single arm of intimate partner violence.
And then when it's picked up by websites who are going to spin the news largely on the title and summary, it's just a little frustrating.
If you read either of these articles let me know what your takeaway is!
Thanks for reading, please leave a comment or check us out at:
MM's
